Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Free Online Jerusalem Bible
The network is free, fast, plural and especially revolutionary. No to
Law "killer blog!
A year ago, the bill was "Levi - Prodi", which fortunately did not pass today, the bill C-1269, two proposals have the same goal to put a gag on information disclosed on the Internet.
The proposed law also known as the killer blog "has caused outrage among bloggers who have felt pulled in case, and are activated as they are at risk
But the simple" blog of opinion "?
analyze the articles in question:
Art.2 "(Definition of editorial product).
For the purposes of this Act, for publishing product means any product bearing purposes of providing information, training, dissemination or publication is intended for entertainment and, whatever the form in which it is made and the means by which it is disseminated. "This definition is part of any blog.
Art.8 (Publishing on the Internet)
entry in the register of communications operators of entities engaged in publishing on the Internet also notes the implementation of the standards for liability related to the violation of press. Are excluded from entry in the Register of Communications Operators those who access the Internet or operating on the same forms or products, such as carpooling or personal sites, which are not the result of an entrepreneurial organization of work. "
From these articles you can see that the blog" opinion "are considered as" editorial products "but not" constitute the result of an entrepreneurial organization of work ", so the fear of the complaint is unfounded. True
those affected by the law will be the collective journalistic blog, behind which there are staff reporters paid to do information.
The rules must be respected, but not those that endanger democracy and that is unconstitutional, as this bill is pure censorship.
protests of Internet browsers, the petition against the "law blog kills" were used to something, in fact, Levi has backtracked regarding the bill that would limit the freedom of bloggers.
The deputy of the Democratic Party has said it will cancel the bill that the chapter was the Internet.
I Turn 21 On Saturday And I Have To Renew My
"On himself, on his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign."
J. Stuart Mill
Art.32 of the Constitution "The Republic protects health as a fundamental right of the individual and collective interest, and guarantees free medical care to the indigent.
Nobody can be forced to a specific medical treatment unless required by law. The law may in no case violate the limits imposed by respect for the individual (health treatments must respect the physical integrity of the patient and should demonstrate respect for the dignity and privacy of the person).
Eluana a girl like many others, cheerful, happy with so many dreams to realize, with a life ahead of him, but fate has reserved a different future.
In January 1992, due to an accident, Eluana enter into a deep coma for a serious head injury, after twelve months comes the definitive diagnosis and safe permanent vegetative state, that is irreversible.
For sixteen years the life of Eluana, if we can determine, is this: his eyes open and close the rhythm of day and night, but do not see you. The lips are shaken by a tremor continued, the arts thesis in a spasm and feet in equinus. A tube through the nose brings the food to the stomach.
Every morning the nurses washed her face and body with a sponge. Every two hours the turn in bed. Once a day they put it on a chair with reclining back, being not wait to fall forward. Then back to bed.
Since 1996 his father, Beppino Englaro, advocates that the force-feeding holding his daughter in life is interrupted. After a long battle
Legal Court of Appeal of Milan approved the Civil father as legal guardian, to discontinue the hydration and forced feeding, the decree was ratified by the Supreme Court because the measure is effective immediately and can already be implemented.
Eluana would be transferred soon from a hospital in Udine, which he had given his willingness to accept the young woman.
But Welfare Minister Maurizio Sacconi has intervened with a ministerial act to prevent Eluana care should be suspended, arguing that "stop nutrition and hydration for people in persistent vegetative state is not legal for the public and private National Health Service. " This document was sent to the regions based on some previous indications, including that of the National Committee for Bioethics and Article 25 of the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities' s UN.
Minister Sacconi not knowing what to stick to his veto based on opinions of the NBC but it has no legal value and Article 25 of the UN Convention which was ratified by Parliament, also has the claim to decide what is legal and what is not, caring about the right not to undergo medical treatment and freedom of self-determination.
In conclusion, this act of the Minister Sacconi prevents the implementation of a sentence the court of the Italian Republic.
Eluana, Giorgio Welbi and many others who have no voice to be heard, people crushed by a tragic fate that deprived them of life and sentenced them to survive without dignity.
For these people, their families and to ensure the freedom of citizens is necessary for Parliament to approve a law on living wills, which confirms the right to health, but not obliged to treatment, which guarantees the freedom to live with dignity.
You can not be forced to "live" at the behest of the State or the ethics imposed by some religious vision.
J. Stuart Mill
Art.32 of the Constitution "The Republic protects health as a fundamental right of the individual and collective interest, and guarantees free medical care to the indigent.
Nobody can be forced to a specific medical treatment unless required by law. The law may in no case violate the limits imposed by respect for the individual (health treatments must respect the physical integrity of the patient and should demonstrate respect for the dignity and privacy of the person).
Eluana a girl like many others, cheerful, happy with so many dreams to realize, with a life ahead of him, but fate has reserved a different future.
In January 1992, due to an accident, Eluana enter into a deep coma for a serious head injury, after twelve months comes the definitive diagnosis and safe permanent vegetative state, that is irreversible.
For sixteen years the life of Eluana, if we can determine, is this: his eyes open and close the rhythm of day and night, but do not see you. The lips are shaken by a tremor continued, the arts thesis in a spasm and feet in equinus. A tube through the nose brings the food to the stomach.
Every morning the nurses washed her face and body with a sponge. Every two hours the turn in bed. Once a day they put it on a chair with reclining back, being not wait to fall forward. Then back to bed.
Since 1996 his father, Beppino Englaro, advocates that the force-feeding holding his daughter in life is interrupted. After a long battle
Legal Court of Appeal of Milan approved the Civil father as legal guardian, to discontinue the hydration and forced feeding, the decree was ratified by the Supreme Court because the measure is effective immediately and can already be implemented.
Eluana would be transferred soon from a hospital in Udine, which he had given his willingness to accept the young woman.
But Welfare Minister Maurizio Sacconi has intervened with a ministerial act to prevent Eluana care should be suspended, arguing that "stop nutrition and hydration for people in persistent vegetative state is not legal for the public and private National Health Service. " This document was sent to the regions based on some previous indications, including that of the National Committee for Bioethics and Article 25 of the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities' s UN.
Minister Sacconi not knowing what to stick to his veto based on opinions of the NBC but it has no legal value and Article 25 of the UN Convention which was ratified by Parliament, also has the claim to decide what is legal and what is not, caring about the right not to undergo medical treatment and freedom of self-determination.
In conclusion, this act of the Minister Sacconi prevents the implementation of a sentence the court of the Italian Republic.
Eluana, Giorgio Welbi and many others who have no voice to be heard, people crushed by a tragic fate that deprived them of life and sentenced them to survive without dignity.
For these people, their families and to ensure the freedom of citizens is necessary for Parliament to approve a law on living wills, which confirms the right to health, but not obliged to treatment, which guarantees the freedom to live with dignity.
You can not be forced to "live" at the behest of the State or the ethics imposed by some religious vision.
Masterbation With Teddybears
Who will save the culture??
From north to south, the young people say NO!
6agosto 2008.1 September 2008 children will be born in these days, you will be married couples in love and will be succeeded by so many other things, but for us students, researchers, teachers and temporary workers are two dates that marked the end of many future with high hopes.
August 6 and September 1, 2008 are the dates of publication in the Official Gazette, the two most disputed by-laws of 2008 (unless there is agreement also in 2009) the first date is the law 133/2008 of the Minister Tremonti The second date is the law 137/2008 of the Minister Gelmini. The protest began
In September, the first to express their dissent against the decree law 137/2008 were teachers in elementary and middle schools. Decree-Law 137/2008
known as the Gelmini decree does not include cuts to universities, as erroneously thought for a long time most students, this actually consists of eight articles and has targeted the primary and secondary schools, include: reduction of 'school hours and teaching staff, classes have entered (or bridge) for the children of immigrants, the return of voting behavior, the single teacher in elementary school. After a while the insurgents are
world of universities and research, students left and right united to say Finance Law no 133/2008, which includes: funding cuts to universities, the hiring freeze, layoffs and the possibility of transforming the universities into foundations.
There were peaceful protests, which have driven the colored squares, university courses in the major cities from north to south, have been made to assemble weigh the pros and cons of the law, many lessons were held in the square.
universities and institutes have been busy and our prime minister wanted to vacate the building by sending the police, ignoring that the occupation of such buildings is a legitimate means of protest that students can apply when all other forms of dialogue and / or protest be ignored.
( Art .21 of the Constitution provides for freedom of expression)
We have a Constitution because they do not browse it?
L 'Article 9 of the Constitution "The Republic promotes the development of culture and science and technology" in fact, the law 133/2008 provides that the fund for the financing of the universities will be reduced to € 63.5 million the year 2009, € 190 million for the year 2010 of € 316 million for the year 2011, of € 417 million for the year 2012 and € 455 million from the year 2013.
Then there were clashes in Piazza Navona in Rome, between the left and the group left on one side and the antagonist Lock student (right) on the other. The version in the Government slants to the left of the balance of responsibilities. I will not talk on the board of watching videos on the clashes and I wonder how it was possible in a square full of boys and girls peaceful, has entered a van full of clubs and bars? And why the police, who were numerous, did not intervene while unarmed teenagers were beaten? In an interview
Minister Gelmini is convinced that "when you are far-reaching reforms will always pay a price in terms of criticism and resistance to change. I remain convinced that the country has the right to an education system modern and it is my duty to work in this direction. "
conclude our roundup of articles citing the Art 34 of the Constitution "The school is open to all" ... .. will remain so in the coming years?
The protest from North to South in schools, universities, the streets will continue until the government's steps.
The future is in young people, believe in finding out more and help us grow.
From north to south, the young people say NO!
6agosto 2008.1 September 2008 children will be born in these days, you will be married couples in love and will be succeeded by so many other things, but for us students, researchers, teachers and temporary workers are two dates that marked the end of many future with high hopes.
August 6 and September 1, 2008 are the dates of publication in the Official Gazette, the two most disputed by-laws of 2008 (unless there is agreement also in 2009) the first date is the law 133/2008 of the Minister Tremonti The second date is the law 137/2008 of the Minister Gelmini. The protest began
In September, the first to express their dissent against the decree law 137/2008 were teachers in elementary and middle schools. Decree-Law 137/2008
known as the Gelmini decree does not include cuts to universities, as erroneously thought for a long time most students, this actually consists of eight articles and has targeted the primary and secondary schools, include: reduction of 'school hours and teaching staff, classes have entered (or bridge) for the children of immigrants, the return of voting behavior, the single teacher in elementary school. After a while the insurgents are
world of universities and research, students left and right united to say Finance Law no 133/2008, which includes: funding cuts to universities, the hiring freeze, layoffs and the possibility of transforming the universities into foundations.
There were peaceful protests, which have driven the colored squares, university courses in the major cities from north to south, have been made to assemble weigh the pros and cons of the law, many lessons were held in the square.
universities and institutes have been busy and our prime minister wanted to vacate the building by sending the police, ignoring that the occupation of such buildings is a legitimate means of protest that students can apply when all other forms of dialogue and / or protest be ignored.
( Art .21 of the Constitution provides for freedom of expression)
We have a Constitution because they do not browse it?
L 'Article 9 of the Constitution "The Republic promotes the development of culture and science and technology" in fact, the law 133/2008 provides that the fund for the financing of the universities will be reduced to € 63.5 million the year 2009, € 190 million for the year 2010 of € 316 million for the year 2011, of € 417 million for the year 2012 and € 455 million from the year 2013.
Then there were clashes in Piazza Navona in Rome, between the left and the group left on one side and the antagonist Lock student (right) on the other. The version in the Government slants to the left of the balance of responsibilities. I will not talk on the board of watching videos on the clashes and I wonder how it was possible in a square full of boys and girls peaceful, has entered a van full of clubs and bars? And why the police, who were numerous, did not intervene while unarmed teenagers were beaten? In an interview
Minister Gelmini is convinced that "when you are far-reaching reforms will always pay a price in terms of criticism and resistance to change. I remain convinced that the country has the right to an education system modern and it is my duty to work in this direction. "
conclude our roundup of articles citing the Art 34 of the Constitution "The school is open to all" ... .. will remain so in the coming years?
The protest from North to South in schools, universities, the streets will continue until the government's steps.
The future is in young people, believe in finding out more and help us grow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)